Thursday, May 28, 2015
Monday, May 25, 2015
Former DOJ Attorney Has Filed for the Deportation of Barack Obama, Exposes THIS Evidence
Former DOJ Attorney Has Filed for the Deportation of Barack Obama, Exposes THIS Evidence
Larry Klayman wants to deport President Barack Obama. The former Department of Justice attorney has submitted a petition that would initiate a legal process that would eventually deport the president.
Klayman recently sent his 20-page “deportation petition” to the acting director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a fraud detection director at DHS and a director of enforcement and removal operations at the Department of Homeland Security.
“There is prima facie evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is removable from the United States and in violation of the law under the legally recognized categories of falsely claiming U.S. citizenship,” Klayman wrote in the petition. (H/T The Daily Caller)
“Even if a legitimate birth certificate exists, Barack Obama’s repeated use of a clearly forged birth certificate is still a crime,” Klayman said.
Klayman is founder of Judicial Watch and, in 2013, successfully sued the National Security Agency and the Obama administration over the massive surveillance of phone records citing constitutional grounds.
In the petition, Klayman contends that Obama should be deported because “he has falsified various birth and other documents with regard to obtaining a U.S. passport and other privileges as an alleged American citizen,” according to the source.
Klayman is one of many skeptical Americans who believe Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery, filled with “unmistakable errors and defects,” which include a fake social Security Number and name.
Such a forgery, according to Klayman, nullifies Obama’s citizenship and should result in deportation.
If Klayman’s petition were successful and Obama were removed from office, it would be too late to undo the damage he has done to this country. Still, many would see much justice in Obama finally getting what they say he deserves.
Warning: You WILL be interrogated for driving within 100 miles of the Canadian border
http://www.militianews.com/warning-you-will-be-interrogated-for-driving-within-100-miles-of-the-canadian-border/
Taken right our of the playbook of Nazi Germany, random checkpoints are being set up by U.S. Customs [DHS] agents in the northeast within 100 miles of the Canadian border.
The Border Patrol operates a national network of internal checkpoints, illegally stopping motorists up to 100 miles inside our border! These illegal checkpoints allow DHS to stop and search law-abiding American citizens without justification.
It’s about to get much WORSE, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee approved Bill S.750 which gives Border Patrol/DHS agents “immediate access to federal land within 100 miles” of both national borders and prohibit the “Secretaries of Interior and Agriculture” from impeding any CBP activities.
“Border Patrol already has unfettered access to protected federal public lands along the border,” Dan Millis, borderlands program coordinator for the Grand Canyon Chapter of theSierra Club. “In fact, Border Patrol currently has more access to the border and surrounding lands than the public.”
Imagine this: You and your family drive to Maine to visit Acadia National Park which receives over 2 MILLION tourists. Acadia is within 100 miles of the border and our govt sets up checkpoints to interrogate EVERY visitor! That’s the future of Police State America if we allow this B.S. to continue.
Christian RamÃrez, director of the Southern Border Communities Coalition, criticized the legislation not only for what it sets out to do, but for what it doesn’t do. “What any border bill should include are reforms to Customs and Border Protection to ensure greater oversight and accountability, none of which are included in S.750.”
“Imagine this: Border Patrol decides to construct a surveillance tower dozens of feet tall, armed with cameras and motion sensors, in Saguaro National Park — Tucson’s backyard gem — with no public consultation,” added Millis. “It demonstrates the overreach and overkill of waiving laws 100 miles inland. That’s what McCain’s bill does.”
The ACLU has called for rejection of the 100-mile designation and wants CBP’s authority to be limited to “no more than 25 miles from the border and…incursions onto private property to no more than 10 miles.” “The ‘100-Mile Rule’ has never been subjected to meaningful debate or scrutiny in Congress. There is nothing in the record to indicate whether the Justice Department’s designation of 100 miles as a ‘reasonable distance’ was anything other than an arbitrary selection.”
The Watertown Daily Times describes how the Border Patrol is interrogating motorists in the Northeast:
Last week, Jessica A. Cooke, 21, Ogdensburg, was pulled over at a border checkpoint in Waddington by border patrol agents who wanted to search her car’s trunk. During an altercation that followed, Ms. Cooke was Tasered for recording them!
No charges have been filed and Ms. Cooke said she never was read her Miranda rights, adding she was told by agents they were trying to decide whether to file state or federal charges of assaulting an officer.
“They are trying to say that I put my hands on him first,” Ms. Cooke said. “That’s stupid; I had both hands on my phone, recording.”
The incident, which was captured on a cellphone video taken by Ms. Cooke, has prompted a spirited debate on social media sites. Ms. Cooke, a SUNY Canton criminal justice major who graduated Saturday, claims she was wrongfully assaulted and has threatened to file a lawsuit.
Several people said they believed both parties deserve some blame for the altercation: Ms. Cooke for provoking agents with an uncooperative attitude and the agents for using excessive force to restrain her.
Local citizens and visitors: speak out:
■ In Watertown, Antonio F. Gigliotti said he does not consider road checkpoints set up by the Border Patrol to be cause for concern. “They don’t bother me,” he said. Mr. Gigliotti said he has traveled through checkpoints before without an issue. He said since he does not have anything to hide, he never feels worried when he passes through one.
■ William R. Wagstaff Jr., Massena, said he believes border patrol agents at times abuse their power by asking to inspect vehicles without having reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed.
“This woman had every right to refuse to open her trunk,” Mr. Wagstaff said in an email. “I have refused several times to let them search me and put their K-9 in my vehicle.”
“This woman had every right to refuse to open her trunk,” Mr. Wagstaff said in an email. “I have refused several times to let them search me and put their K-9 in my vehicle.”
Mr. Wagstaff said he filed a complaint with the Department of Homeland Security in Washington, D.C., and received a letter of apology. He also filed a complaint with border patrol officials in Swanton, Vt. “Now I don’t get harassed anymore,” he said.
■ A 26-year-old SUNY Canton student who asked that his name be withheld said he has personally experienced aggressive questioning by border patrol agents in Buffalo where he resides. He believes he was targeted because he is a black man who was traveling to Grand Island, a predominately white community. “Protection is definitely needed, but it’s wrong when that authority gets abused,” he said. “They (border patrol agents) have a role to play, but it must be contained in that role.”
Referring to Ms. Cooke’s situation, he said, “Her tone was a little abrasive, but they shouldn’t have put their hands on her. She wasn’t a threat to them or anyone around her.”
■ Edward B. Foote, 21, Canton, said he felt border patrol checkpoints were necessary to catch people with illegal drugs. “They (border patrol) probably push the limits sometimes, but I’ve never had that experience,” Mr. Foote said.
■ John Woodard Jr., Massena, said he believed the patrol officer in question in Ms. Cooke’s case went overboard with his behavior. “I think it was a little too excessive, actually,” Mr. Woodard said. “I think they’ve got a lot of stipulations for you to get across the border. People that have just minor felonies can’t even go across the border.”
■ Tim Drew, an Arizona resident who was interviewed in Massena, said while he has had limited experience dealing with border patrol on the U.S.-Canada line, he said he is familiar with border issues on the border with Mexico.
“I mean it’s regrettable, but when you enforce procedures in light of the recent security situations, innocent people do sometimes get hurt and it’s unfortunate, but I don’t find it to be wrong.”
Therein lies the problem, the public finds Border Patrol/DHS abuse “regrettable but don’t find it to be WRONG”!
There are too many SHEEPLE who don’t care if our rights are destroyed by DHS run law enforcement.
Written by Susan Mende.
SHARER LINKS TO SPREAD THE TRUTH WORLDWIDE PATRIOTS
Sunday, May 24, 2015
BOOM: Trey Gowdy Launches “Controversial” Plan For the 50 States to Defy Barack Obama
http://conservativetribune.com/gowdy-launches-state-plan/
In the face of Barack Obama’s refusal to protect the nation’s sieve-like borders, the individual states feel powerless to address their illegal immigrant problem. But Representative Trey Gowdy (R-SC) just proposed a bill that could be the perfect solution.
Last week, Gowdy unveiled the “The Michael Davis, Jr. in Honor of State and Local Law Enforcement Act.”
The legislation is an immigration enforcement bill named in recognition of Officer Michael Davis, who was killed in the line of duty by a twice previously deported criminal illegal alien. His murderer is a poignant example of the massive population being escorted into America by the Obama administration.
In response, Rep. Gowdy is pushing for local governments to defend their own border and enforce immigration laws. This bill would equip and empower local law enforcement to police the border breakdown.
Because local law enforcement is always more directly involved with the hands-on policing tasks, Gowdy believes this places them in the best position to fight this crucial battle at the border.
It can’t be ignored that Gowdy’s bill would be superfluous if Obama’s cowardly policies had not surrendered the border already. Obama is proactively ordering federal agent to ignore current immigration laws.
The immigration policies of the current White House reveal either a disturbing cowardice to fight the problem or a treasonous desire to weaken American borders. Both alternatives are unacceptable and must be addressed immediately.
The brilliance of Rep. Gowdy’s bill is clear in the context of Obama’s failures. Local law enforcement are simply better equipped to defend the border due to their close proximity, increased manpower, and the obvious community-based motivation to protect their towns and cities. (H/T Universalfreepress.com)
The legislation may have a tough road ahead, but Rep. Gowdy is proving he is more than capable of fighting the biggest battles in Washington D.C.
Please like and share on Facebook to help protect America’s borders and show Rep. Gowdy our support.
REBELLION: This State Just Voted to Ignore ALL Obama’s Executive Orders
Barbara Boston
This week, Arizona passed two bills to stop Obama dead in his tracks.
The first bill, Arizona House Bill 2368, introduced by Rep. Bob Thorpe (R-Flagstaff), prevents the state of Arizona from funding any executive orders issued by President Obama, or policy directives issued by the Department of Justice.
The Arizona State Legislature website described the bill as prohibiting “this state or any of its political subdivisions from using any personnel or financial resources to enforce, administer or cooperate with an executive order issued by the President of the U.S. that has not been affirmed by a vote of Congress and signed into law as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution.” (H/TOpposingViews.com)
Barack Obama is not afraid to wield executive power to accomplish his agenda. Whether he is ordering immigration officials to ignore deportation laws or mandating certain crimes not be prosecuted, Obama loves to run America by his own rules.
But one state just came up with a surprising plan to stop Obama’s end-run around democracy. This state’s move could prove to be first among many states rejecting Obama’s overreaching.
This week, Arizona passed two bills to stop Obama dead in his tracks.
The first bill, Arizona House Bill 2368, introduced by Rep. Bob Thorpe (R-Flagstaff), prevents the state of Arizona from funding any executive orders issued by President Obama, or policy directives issued by the Department of Justice.
The Arizona State Legislature website described the bill as prohibiting “this state or any of its political subdivisions from using any personnel or financial resources to enforce, administer or cooperate with an executive order issued by the President of the U.S. that has not been affirmed by a vote of Congress and signed into law as prescribed by the U.S. Constitution.” (H/T OpposingViews.com)
Please like and share on Facebook to support Arizona and to help other states have the courage to stand up for democracy.
Friday, May 22, 2015
A Congressional House committee has voted to get rid of labels on packages of meat that say where the animals were born, raised and slaughtered.
#Move #To #Recall #Any #Congressman #Supporting #This #Bill
this puts #lives #at #risk of #ecoli #And other #FoodPoisoning
#Congressmen #Are #You #Insane ..#This #Will #Cause #Mass #Deaths
this puts #lives #at #risk of #ecoli #And other #FoodPoisoning
#Congressmen #Are #You #Insane ..#This #Will #Cause #Mass #Deaths
http://www.infowars.com/congress-moves-to-eliminate-labels-showing-consumers-where-meat-comes-from-following-wto-ruling/
Food contamination by E. coli bacteria kills three children in Western Washington in January and February 1993.
http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm…
Food contamination by E. coli bacteria kills three children in Western Washington in January and February 1993.
HistoryLink.org Essay 5687 : Printer-Friendly Format
Food contamination by E. coli bacteria kills three children in Western Washington in January and February 1993.
http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm…
Food contamination by E. coli bacteria kills three children in Western Washington in January and February 1993.
HistoryLink.org Essay 5687 : Printer-Friendly Format
{ http://www.nytimes.com/…/company-news-jack-in-the-box-s-wor… }
http://en.wikipedia.org/…/1993_Jack_in_the_Box_E._coli_outb…
http://en.wikipedia.org/…/1993_Jack_in_the_Box_E._coli_outb…
Jack in the Box E. coli Outbreak Lawsuits - Western States ...
www.marlerclark.com/…/jack-in-the-box-e-coli-outbreak-weste…
Jack in the Box E. coli Outbreak Lawsuits - Western States (1993) ... had consumed hamburgers purchased from Jack in the Box restaurants in the days before becoming ill. ... 144 people were hospitalized; 30 developed HUS, and three died.
www.marlerclark.com/…/jack-in-the-box-e-coli-outbreak-weste…
Jack in the Box E. coli Outbreak Lawsuits - Western States (1993) ... had consumed hamburgers purchased from Jack in the Box restaurants in the days before becoming ill. ... 144 people were hospitalized; 30 developed HUS, and three died.
In January and February 1993, food contamination by E. coli bacteria kills three children in Western Washington. More than 450 persons fall ill after consuming undercooked hamburger or being exposed to infected persons. The source of the contamination will be traced to Jack in the Box Restaurants and to its meat supplier, Von's in California. .
The Vulnerable Young
Between January 3 and January 17, 1993, 50 people, most of them children and most of them in Western Washington, reported to hospitals complaining of severe stomach cramps and bloody diarrhea. Some children had to be placed on dialysis after their kidneys failed. On January 19 alone, 38 people reported the symptoms. Ultimately, three children died, a two-year-old girl from Snohomish County, a two-year-old boy from Tacoma, and a 16-month-old boy from Bellingham. The children died of heart failure brought on by kidney disease. Forty percent of those infected were under the age of six and two thirds were younger than 15.
Many of the sick children were treated at Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, which was swamped with more than 45 patients along with a seasonal rush of respiratory cases. Children who survive E. coli illness often develop kidney problems in 10 to 15 years. Some survivors lost organs such as colons and gall bladders which were damaged.
Origin of the Outbreak
The bacterium, officially known as Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Escherichia [Genus] coli [Species]) was traced to undercooked hamburger served at Jack in the Box Restaurants. Full cooking destroys the bacterium. Jack in the Box recalled all meat on January 18, as soon as the outbreak was announced. Some victims did not consume the meat, but were infected at day care centers by others who had. More than 450 cases were reported in Washington and 100 more elsewhere in the West. Investigation by health officials found that Jack in the Box had received the meat from a November 19, 1992, production run at Von's in California. One child in San Diego died in December after eating hamburger from a fast food restaurant there. Jack in the Box offered to pay the medical costs of all the victims.
By the end of March 1993, reports of the illness had stopped. Previously, an E. coli outbreak in Walla Walla County in 1986 had killed two people.
Sources:
"Bacterial Sickness Hits Dozens of Children," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 18, 1993, p. B-1; Robert L. Jamieson and Eric Houston, "Lawsuits Filed Over Burgers," Ibid., January 26, 1993, p. A-1; James L. Eng, "Death Linked to Tainted Burger Food Poisoning," The Los Angeles Times, January 24, 1993, p. 5; Lee Moriwaki and Kay Kasumoto, "Burger Chair Offers to Pay Medical Bills," The Seattle Times, February 1, 1993, p. A-1; Warren King, "State's E. Coli Epidemic Heads Toward 500 Cases," Ibid., February 9, 1993, p. B-1; David Brown, "From Herd to Hamburgers," The Washington Post, February 8, 1993, p. A-3.
"Bacterial Sickness Hits Dozens of Children," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, January 18, 1993, p. B-1; Robert L. Jamieson and Eric Houston, "Lawsuits Filed Over Burgers," Ibid., January 26, 1993, p. A-1; James L. Eng, "Death Linked to Tainted Burger Food Poisoning," The Los Angeles Times, January 24, 1993, p. 5; Lee Moriwaki and Kay Kasumoto, "Burger Chair Offers to Pay Medical Bills," The Seattle Times, February 1, 1993, p. A-1; Warren King, "State's E. Coli Epidemic Heads Toward 500 Cases," Ibid., February 9, 1993, p. B-1; David Brown, "From Herd to Hamburgers," The Washington Post, February 8, 1993, p. A-3.
By David Wilma, April 08, 2004
Thursday, May 21, 2015
Iran’s leader endangers deal, rejects access to military sites, again
http://universalfreepress.com/irans-leader-endangers-deal-rejects-access-to-military-sites-again/
Read more at http://universalfreepress.com/irans-leader-endangers-deal-rejects-access-to-military-sites-again/
In what can only be termed as a “thumb-of-the-nose” to President Obama’s Iranian Nuclear Deal, Iran’s supreme leader vowed Wednesday he will not allow international inspection of Iran’s military sites or access to Iranian scientists under any nuclear agreement with world powers. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told military commanders Wednesday that Iran will resist “coercion and excessive demands” from America and other world powers.
Negotiators from Iran and a six nation group — the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany — have launched a new round of talks in Vienna focused on reaching a final deal that curbs Iran’s nuclear program in return for lifting economic sanctions. The two sides reached a framework agreement in March and hope to strike a final deal by June 30.
A fact sheet on the framework accord issued by the U.S. State Department said Iran would be required to grant the U.N. nuclear agency access to any “suspicious sites.” And Obama has promised congress that any deal would include such access.
Khamenei said interviewing Iranian nuclear scientists would be an affront to Iran’s dignity. “I will not allow foreigners to interview — which is tantamount to interrogation — the prominent beloved scientists and sons of this nation,” he said.
Ali Akbar Velayati, a senior adviser to Khamenei, was quoted by Iranian media this week as accusing the Americans of changing their position and toughening their stance as the deadline approaches. “They insist on crossing (our) red lines. This turns into an obstacle,” Velayati was quoted as saying
This is the same position that Iran has had since day one of the negotiations. If it is not changed, it is hard to see the American government, congress or the American people, not to mention our allies going along with the proposed agreement.
Read more at http://universalfreepress.com/irans-leader-endangers-deal-rejects-access-to-military-sites-again/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)