34,000 Black Churches Break Fellowship with Presbyterian Church USA over Gay Marriage!

It's still going on: Satan captures one group after another when churches FAIL TO FOLLOW THE WORD OF GOD!!! The Bible is pretty clear on what's right or wrong!

Thank God for the 34,000 pastors who are leading their flocks in accordance with the Word of God, AS HE WROTE IT!!!

This is a sad time for PCUSA, as they lead their congregants down the road to destruction!! Pray for them. In fact, pray for all involved, good and otherwise! "David Wright"

http://eaglerising.com/16750/34000-black-churches-break-fellowship-with-presbyterian-church-usa-over-gay-marriage/#sdcQyLSASqYuUgox.99

The Presbyterian Church USA recently changed it’s denominations constitution to approve of same-sex marriage. The move didn’t come as a surprise for most observers, but it was still a blow to American Christianity. The denomination’s decision further separates them from American mainstream evangelical Christianity, and it continues a long train of abuses from the PCUSA against orthodox Christian teaching.

For one group the decision was also a final blow to their tenuous relationship.

The National Black Church Initiative (NBCI) is a coalition of more than 34,000 African-American churches across 15 denominations with over 15 million congregants, who, upon hearing of the PCUSA’s move to approve gay marriage, decided to end their relationship with the PCUSA.

NBCI President Reverend Anthony Evans had this to say about the decision to part ways with the PCUSA:

"NBCI and its membership base are simply standing on the Word of God within the mind of Christ. We urge our brother and sisters of the PCUSA to repent and be restored to fellowship." 

"PCUSA's manipulation represents a universal sin against the entire church and its members. With this action, PCUSA can no longer base its teachings on 2,000 years of Christian scripture and tradition, and call itself a Christian entity in the body of Christ.  It has forsaken its right by this single wrong act.  

"Apostle Paul warns us about this when he declared in Galatians 1:8 that there are those who will preach another gospel. 

"For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him. ... For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. 

"No church has the right to change the Word of God. By voting to redefine marriage PCUSA automatically forfeits Christ's saving grace. There is always redemption in the body of Christ through confession of faith and adhering to Holy Scripture.

"In this case, PCUSA deliberately voted to change the

Word of God and the interpretation of holy marriage between one man and one woman. This is why we must break fellowship with them and urge the entire Christendom to do so as well."

It’s fairly safe to say that conservative churches will continue to abandon the PCUSA ship in droves… as they’ve been doing for years now.

In 1967, the PC(USA) had 3,304,321 members. In 2013, the membership was 1,760,200, a decline of 47 percent.

Meanwhile the conservative Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) has been growing!

In 1973, the PCA had 41,232 members. In 2013, the membership was 367,033, an increase of 790 percent.

When your values and beliefs change as culture shifts, how can you pretend that your “wisdom” or “advice” has any power? Why should anyone listen to you when your very beliefs may be different just a few short years from now? PCUSA, you need to face the facts… America and the world no longer has any use for you. It’s for the PCUSA to close their doors and head on home. And Good Riddance to a destitute denomination that would rather please men than please the Almighty God
http://www.christianpost.com/news/34000-black-churches-leave-pcusa-over-same-sex-marriage-136530/.

Young Black Man Inspired By Eric Holder And Obama And Sharpton Is charged in shooting Ferguson Officers discusses it in jail audio

ST. LOUIS (AP) — The attorney for the man accused of shooting two police officers during a demonstration in Ferguson expressed surprise Wednesday at audio of jail telephone calls in which his client appears to confess.

Jeffrey L. Williams, 20, is accused of shooting and wounding the officers on March 12, during an early-morning rally sparked by the resignation of Ferguson’s police chief.

Prosecutors say Williams told investigators he fired a gun but was aiming at someone else. KMOV-TV first obtained audio of several of Williams’ phone conversations from at the St. Louis County Justice Center. St. Louis County Justice Services Director Herbert Bernsen confirmed the audio is from calls made by Williams and provided The Associated Press with the sound files.

It wasn’t clear to whom Williams was speaking. In one call, Williams said he was having trouble with a group of people, prompting an exchange of gunfire.

“Nobody aiming at no police,” Williams says. “I ran up the hill and he (an unidentified person) shot at the car. … I shot back,” Williams said.

In another conversation, Williams expressed concern about a possible lengthy prison sentence.

“Even though I was in the wrong, though, I should have just went the other way,” he said. “Oh man, now I’m looking at 10 years.” 

ST. LOUIS (AP) —
http://m.chron.com/news/us/article/Man-charged-in-shooting-officers-discusses-it-in-6173081.php

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION ON TWITTER

https://twitter.com/nra

BREITBART:Gutfield---Gun Control Losing Because Americans Refuse To Feel Guilty Over Self-Defence

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/04/greg-gutfeld-gun-control-losing-because-americans-refuse-to-feel-guilty-over-self-defense/

On April 3, Fox News’ host Greg Gutfeld explained that the media’s gun control arguments increasingly fall on deaf ears because Americans refuse to feel guilty over using guns for self-defense.

Gutfeld said, “No matter how hard the establishment media tries, they can’t convince good people how bad guns are when they’re in the right hands.”

He then explained that the American people, while supportive of the police, have simply come to realize that there are long seconds–and frequently, agonizing minutes–between the time they dial 911 and the time police arrive. Moreover, he stressed that Americans understand that in many instances the police will only be coming to count bodies–that any defense that is going to happen has to happen before badges, handcuffs, or sirens are on the scene.

Gutfeld suggested the gun control media’s inability to understand these things has only placed greater distance between their esoteric arguments and the American people. He said:

Perhaps the media misses the big point. They do their theorizing from the fish bowl of a well-protected studio and travel to and from work at reasonable hours through tiny neighborhoods in secure vehicles. The fine people of Detroit don’t have that luxury; they realize that any argument against arming yourself is full of holes, which is not the way they’d like to end up being.

Empirical support for Gutfeld’s claims can be seen in the pro-gun attitude taking hold in Detroit’s heavily black community right now. Breitbart News recently reported that concealed carry is surging in the black community, and no less a prominent figure than Detroit Police Chief James Craig explained that this is a seismic shift from how things have been historically.

In a tone similar to Gutfeld’s, Craig explained that Detroit residents have simply come to realize that good guys with guns really can protect their own lives and the lives of their neighbors. They have also realized that being armed helps bring stability to their community.

In the real world, these realizations are drowning out anything that gun controllers might say to the contrary.

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

Michael Bloomberg And Cronies Caught Doctoring Info

NRA News

Shared publicly  - 

 #NRA

In this month's NRA America's 1st Freedom: Michael Bloomberg and his cronies get caught in their latest lie, this time trying to convince residents of the safest state in the nation that they really live in an American crime hotbed. Read "Bloomberg’s Gangsta’s Paradise”:https://plus.google.com/105123070224984461528/posts
http://www.americas1stfreedom.org/articles/2015/4/1/welcome-to-michael-bloombergs-gangstas-paradise-aka-vermont/

Welcome To Michael Bloomberg's Gangsta's Paradise (aka Vermont)

by Frank Miniter - Wednesday, April 01, 2015

http://www.americas1stfreedom.org/articles/2015/4/1/welcome-to-michael-bloombergs-gangstas-paradise-aka-vermont/

EVERY 2016 GOP PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFUL BUT BUSH AND CHRISTIE OWN GUNS

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/29/every-2016-gop-presidential-hopeful-but-bush-and-christie-own-guns/

Every 2016 GOP presidential hopeful except Jeb Bush and New Jersey Chris Christie (R) own guns, and lots of them.

Between the “15 noteworthy” contenders there are at least “40 guns” privately owned, and these include Senator Ted Cruz’s (R-TX) .357 Magnum and shotgun, Senator Lindsey Graham’s (R-SC) AR-15, former Governor Rick Perry’s (R-TX) “jogging” gun, the revolver Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) says he bought “for protection” in 2010, and Governor Bobby Jindal’s (R) Smith & Wesson .38 Special, among others.

Yet according to The Washington Post, pro-illegal immigration candidate Jeb Bush does not own one gun, nor does Governor Christie. This news follows Christie’s March 24 claim that he would “respect” gun rights if voters gave him a pro-gun legislature.

Apart from the fact that Bush and Christie don’t own guns, WaPo reports there is “near unanimity” on the issue of guns among all the candidates. But to date, Cruz has emerged as the candidate going beyond mere gun ownership to speak directly about defending the Second Amendment.

Speaking to attendees at a “Lincoln-Reagan” dinner in New Hampshire, Cruz exclaimed, “We need to defend the Second Amendment!” He continued, “I’m pretty sure New Hampshire’s definition of gun control is kind of what it is in Texas. Gun control means hittin’ what you aim [at].”

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker (R) is a gun owner too, and he uses his guns for hunting deer and ducks.

Donald Trump owns two guns–including a Heckler & Koch. .45– and has a license to carry in New York City, while former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina “owns five guns” and says her go-to-weapon is a Glock 17 9mm semiautomatic.

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. 

Iran Nuclear Deal: Bad News To Republicans, Israel, North Korea

http://www.forbes.com/sites/donaldkirk/2015/04/03/iran-nuclear-deal-anathema-to-republicans-israel-and-north-korea/

Israel and Republicans in the U.S. Congress now share common cause with North Korea on one critical topic: they hate the nuclear deal that  negotiators from the U.S. and five other countries have struck with Iran.

While Israeli leaders and commentators denounce the agreement and Republicans vow to fight it in the U.S. Congress, North Korea has already stated that it will never give up its nuclear weapons. Six-party talks with North Korea, hosted by China, screeched to a halt nearly seven years ago and aren’t likely to resume as long as North Korea really has nothing to talk about.

That doesn’t mean, though, that North Korean leaders will not be watching closely to see how the deal works out even if they’re not going to follow Iran’s example.

President Barack Obama walks to the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, Thursday, April 2, 2015, to talk about the breakthrough in the Iranian nuclear talks. The president said the Iran nuclear deal _ if completed_ will make US, allies and the world safer. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

North Korea and Iran are not about to break off close ties forged in cooperation not only on nuclear technology but on missiles and other weaponry.  Iran has sent teams of advisers to North Korea to witness and assist on long-range missile development while North Korea has exported short and mid-range missiles to Iran along with both experts and laborers to work on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

The huge difference, of course, is that Iran professes to be dedicated only to producing nuclear energy for industrial purposes while North Korea is interested only in making warheads.

Energy-poor North Korea, relying on China for all its oil, lost its chance to obtain twin nuclear energy reactors, promised under the 1994 agreed framework with the U.S., when revealed eight years later to be developing highly enriched uranium after having shut down its plutonium program under terms of the agreement. Construction of the twin energy reactors soon stopped, and North Korea resumed building warheads with plutonium and possibly uranium.

Skeptics of the Iranian pledge to downsize its number of centrifuges and stop enriching most of its uranium while agreeing to on-site inspections point out that Korea is now fabricating centrifuges with technology acquired from Iran and from A.Q. Khan when he was running Pakistan’s nuclear program. North Korea is believed to be gearing up for a fourth nuclear test — this one with a device powered by uranium.

The deal with Iran, though, is sure to give pause to North Korea’s nuclear ambitions for a number of reasons.

One is that China, North Korea’s only ally whether North Korean leaders like it or not, is fairly well committed to opposing their nuclear ambition and can slow the flow of oil, as well as food, any time.

Another is the nuclear deal with Iran calls for an end to sanctions if Iran really complies with the terms.  North Korea may not be ready to give up its nukes but might be amenable to an agreement to stop producing them in return for relaxation of sanctions imposed by the UN after its nuclear and missile tests.

Not that North Korea will be ready to resume six-party talks right away — or even in the near future. It does mean, however, that at some stage the North might agree to return to the table with a view to some sign of concessions — an understanding that the U.S. and South Korea demand in advance so the talks won’t be totally useless.

Experts in Washington seem just about unanimous in agreeing, no way will the Iran deal have an impact on North Korea.

Scott Snyder at the Council on Foreign Relations told South Korea’s Yonhap News that “North Korea is in a different situation from Iran, because it has shown no interest in coming back to talks on minimally acceptable terms to the administration.” Alan Romberg at the Stimson Center was quoted as saying “Iran has obviously shown a willingness to curtail its still-nascent program and forgo nuclear weapons” but “North Korea has not — so there really are no parallels.”

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, however, may be in a somewhat different mood after making his first trip outside the country next month — to see Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Russia has formed close ties with both Iran and North Korea — the former as a foil to U.S. aims in the middle east, the latter to counter Chinese influence in North Korea and the U.S. alliance with South Korea.

Putin could suggest to Kim  the advantages of putting on a show of conciliation. North Korea, like Iran, could be the recipient of Soviet arms and aircraft needed to replace its fleet of aging MiGs, gifts from the Soviet Union.

That might not be good news for the U.S., South Korea — or China — but could be persuasive when it comes to persuading North Korea to scale down its nuclear ambitions.  Would North Korea really want to remain the odd man out when offered all that — and maybe, some day, relaxation of onerous sanctions?

To read more of my commentaries on Asia news, click on www.donaldkirk.com,  and the details of my books are available here.

THE TRAITORS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARMING IRAN WITH NUKES

THE INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING THE IRANIAN TERRORISTS

GOVERNMENT NUCLEAR WEAPONS ! PLACING US ALL IN DANGER WORLDWIDE !
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/03/this-is-a-bad-deal-netanyahu-destroys-obamas-emerging-nuclear-deal-with-iran/

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday delivered a sharp rebuke to President Barack Obama by telling Congress that an agreement being negotiated under Obama’s direction is a “bad deal” that won’t prevent a nuclear Iran, and would instead ensure Iran can develop a bomb.

“That’s why this deal is so bad,” he said. “It doesn’t block Iran’s path to the bomb, it paves Iran’s path to the bomb.”

Netanyahu’s roughly 40-minute address was delivered without the approval of the Obama administration, which warned that the U.S. shouldn’t be seen as supporting a national leader so close to his country’s election. But by the end, it seemed clear that the Obama administration might now have to be much more worried about the contents of the speech itself, which undercut much of the work U.S. officials have done over the last year to secure some kind of agreement with Iran.

The speech, marked by several standing ovations, also seems to have infused Republicans and even many Democrats with a tough but clear foreign policy direction on Iran that has been lacking under the Obama administration.

Netanyahu dismantled the nuclear negotiations first by saying Iran has not shown any goodwill toward Israel or other nations, and instead continues to support terrorist acts around the world. He said Iran’s brutal actions undercut its promise to negotiate, and belie the idea that Iran can somehow join the community of nations under its current leadership, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

“So at a time when many hope that Iran will join the community of nations, Iran is busy gobbling up the nations,” he said. “We must all stand together to stop Iran’s march of conquest, subjugation and terror.”

He also dismissed the idea that Iran can be trusted because it’s fighting the Islamic State.

“Iran and ISIS are competing for the crown of militant Islam,” he said. “In this deadly game of thrones, there is no place for America or for Israel, no peace for Christians, Jews or Muslims who don’t share the Islamists’ medieval creed. No rights for women, no freedom for anyone.”

“So when it comes to ISIS, the enemy of your enemy is your enemy,” he said.

Turning to the agreement, Netanyahu said publicly known details about it show two major flaws. The first is that it would leave Iran with a functioning nuclear apparatus that would give Iran a short “breakout” time to get to a nuclear weapon whenever it wants.

“Because Iran’s nuclear program would be left largely intact, Iran’s breakout time would be very short, about a year by U.S. assessments, even shorter by Israel’s,” he said. He also dismissed the agreement’s idea of using inspectors to make sure Iran is complying with the agreement, and said those inspectors would not be able to stop any violations they might find.

The second major flaw, which many Republicans have noted in Congress, is that it would appear to expire after a decade, leaving Iran free to pursue weapons after 10 years.

“A decade may seem like a long time in a political life, but it’s a blink of an eye in the life of a nation,” he said. “It’s a blink of an eye in the life of our children.”

“We all have a responsibility to consider what will happen when Iran’s nuclear capabilities are virtually unrestricted and all the sanctions will have been lifted,” he added.

Netanyahu said Secretary of State John Kerry himself has agreed that Iran could legitimately produce nuclear material after the deal expires, and said countries must not count on Iran changing because of the huge concessions the U.S. is preparing to make.

Instead, he said giving Iran this deal and easing economic sanctions would let Iran continue to terrorize the world, enjoy a healthier economy, and would even force others in the Middle East to pursue their own weapons programs.

“This deal not a farewell to arms, but farewell to arms control,” he said.

Netanyahu said a deal should instead be based on new commitments from Iran to stop its aggressive actions against its neighbors, stop supporting terrorism around the world, and stop its threats to destroy Israel.

“If Iran wants to be treated like a normal country, let it act like a normal country,” he said.

He noted that the Obama administration has said repeatedly that no deal is better than a bad deal, and concluded by saying that as it stands now, the emerging agreement is bad and should be rejected.

“Well, this is a bad deal, this is a very bad deal and we’re better off without it,” he said. And while some have said war is the only alternative to an agreement, Netanyahu dismissed that and said, “The alternative to a bad deal is a much better deal.”

As he did Monday, Netanyahu stressed that he does not want his appearance at Congress to be seen as political, and he went out of his way to thank both Republicans and Democrats for their support of Israel. He began and ended his speech by thanking members of both parties for their support of his country

“I can promise you one more thing,” he said. “Even if Israel has to stand alone, Israel will stand.”

“But I know that Israel does not stand alone,” he added.” I know that America stands with Israel. I know that you stand with Israel.”