Showing posts with label Crimes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Crimes. Show all posts

Thursday, July 30, 2015

Planned Parenthood VP Says Fetuses May Come Out Intact, Agrees Payments ...

                                                     

http://www.centerformedicalprogress.org/human-capital/

Human Capital


The Human Capital project is a 30-month-long investigative journalism study by The Center for Medical Progress, documenting how Planned Parenthood sells the body parts of aborted babies. Citizen journalists at CMP spent two-and-a-half years logging thousands of research hours to painstakingly gather hundreds of hours of undercover footage, dozens of eye-witness testimonies, and nearly two hundred pages of primary source documents. This information will continue to be made available to the public at this site.
The video footage gathered in this project is presented in two formats: 1) as summary videos of specific undercover encounters, and 2) as a multi-part documentary web series, “Human Capital,” which integrates expert interviews, eyewitness accounts, and real-life undercover interactions to tell the story of Planned Parenthood’s commercial exploitation of aborted fetal tissue.
The title “Human Capital” is a wordplay on the typical economic term for the value to an enterprise of the skills and abilities of human individuals. CMP’s project explores the business value of human bodies themselves to Planned Parenthood, and the way the “human capital” of aborted baby parts affects the real human capital of those who work in Planned Parenthood’s abortion clinics.
The sale of aborted fetal tissue is a serious breach of law and ethics that has violations of numerous state and federal laws associated with it. Please sign our petition and contact your elected representatives to urge the U.S. Congress to investigate the black market in aborted baby parts.

Monday, May 4, 2015

More Than 100 Reasons to Vote Against Barack Obama


Below is a good list of reasons not to vote for Barack Obama. They are not listed in order of importance. I list the life issues, which I think are primary, toward the end. Some of the reasons are obviously more important than others. There are probably some things that should be on the list that I haven’t thought of. Some of the items reflect my opinions, but I have tried to document the facts on the list with links to credible news organizations and independent fact check organizations. To make a comment contact me at FrPeter16@cs.com
http://frwest.blogspot.com/2008/09/more-than-100-reasons-to-vote-against.html

Barack Obama is NOT a New Kind of Politician

Barack Obama is a product of the corrupt Chicago political machine. He did nothing to reform it: http://chicagoagainstobama.wordpress.com/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/26/AR2007022600720_2.html


Barack Obama has the most liberal voting record of any other United States Senator:            http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/

Obama had his first political mentor Alice Palmer, thrown off the ballot in Illinois in order to take her place in the Illinois State Senate. It was Alice Palmer who introduced Obama to the domestic terrorists William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn:

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/5/29/23433/5727

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8630.html

Michelle Obama was appointed vice president at the University Of Chicago hospitals in 2005. In 2006, Obama requested that the University of Chicago receive $1 Million to support its construction of the new hospital pavilion:
 http://obamaearmarks.com/2008/09/09/university-of-chicago-medical-center/

Citizens Against Government Waste say that Obama has an 18% rating, McCain is rated 88%. Senator Biden is rated the worst with 0%: http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/citizens_against_government_waste_obama_isnt_the_worst_senator_on_waste_bid/
While Obama talks a lot about “crossing the aisle”. His actual record in this regard is very meager: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/15/records-show-mccain-more-bipartisan/

Barack Obama criticized Hillary Clinton for her financial ties to Wal-Mart, while conveniently failing to mention his own wife’s ties to Wal-Mart:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1551441/Obama-called-hypocrite-for-wife

Obama voted “Present” 129 times as a State Senator to avoid taking a stand on controversial votes: http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/679446,CST-NWS-obama04.article

Obama claimed credit for sponsoring legislation that was actually given to him by his mentor Illinois Senate President Emil Jones. Obama repaid Jones with $300 million of earmarks for Illinois, including tens of millions of dollars of earmarks for pet projects in Emil Jones district: http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/3/23/224059/069

Obama claimed to “press the wrong button” six different times when confronted about controversial votes in the Illinois State Senate:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obamavotes24jan24,1,7079399.story

Fr. Peter West

More Than 100 Reasons to Vote Against Barack Obama

http://frwest.blogspot.com/2008/09/more-than-100-reasons-to-vote-against.html

Fr. Peter West

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

THE DISGRACEFUL EXIT OF ERIC HOLDER

http://bearingarms.com/disgraceful-exit-eric-holder/

The Disgraceful Exit of Eric Holder


Disgraced Obama Administration Attorney General Eric Holder is leaving office under the cloud of scandal… but you wouldn’t know it from the way reporters are mentioning his exit.
Holder is the first Attorney General in U.S. history to be held in criminal contempt by the House of Representatives.  Holder earned his contempt charge for refusing to turn over documents related to the investigation of the Fast and Furious gun running plot that saw the ATF and DOJ run thousands of guns to the Sinaloa drug cartel.
The continuing investigation into Fast and Furious suggests the possibility of criminal conspiracy within the Department of Justice to withhold evidence of who authorized the gun-running plot, and who ondoned the order to supply the cartel with firearms.
It is known that at the time the ATF was supplying the Sinaloa cartel with weapons that President Obama, Attorney General Holder,  and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were propagating the “90-Percent Lie” in an effort to build support for a nationwide ban on semi-automatic firearms by claiming that 90-percent of the firearms used by Mexican drug cartels to murder police and civilians on both sides of the border came from American gun stores.
The actual figure was just 18-percent.
It seems more than a little curious that Holder’s own agencies illegally supplied more than 2,500 of the very weapons used in attempt to support this blatantly false claim.
More than 300 people have been murdered with the weapons smuggled to the Sinaloa cartel by Holder’s agency so far, including law enforcement agents on both sides of the border.
Holder’s Department of Justice refused to prosecute any of the ATF and DOJ agents involved in the gun running plot, or the on-going cover-up.
Likewise, Holder’s sudden and unexpected resignation seems directly to another high-level criminal conspiracy currently unfolding around the case of Jay Dobyns, an ATF agent turned whistleblower. DOJ attorneys in the Dobyn’s case were accused of conspiring to commit fraud against the court and witness intimidation, only to have an investigation of those criminal charges shot down by top DOJ brass in a brazen cover-up that has been described as worse that Watergate.
Deputy Attorney General James Cole resigned and Attorney General Eric Holder announced his resignation at the same time that the judge in the Dobyns case alleged that DOJ committed fraud against the court and threatened witnesses.
Somehow, the media is refusing to see the connections… or  more likely, is intentionally ignoring them.
Admitting that the tenure of Eric Holder is filled with cover-ups and apparent criminal activity is to admit that the media has utterly refused to hold this administration responsible for the kind of behavior that would have had them screaming for impeachment and criminal charges against previous administrations for lesse
r behavior.
Instead of pressing Holder on his criminal contempt charges or the two major scandals tied to his office that call the very credibility and integrity of the Justice Department itself into question, we get softball interviews from the likes of the Los Angeles Times, wherefawning treatment is given to a man who has disgraced his office like no one in history.
Journalism is dead.
The cause of death is suicide.
Update: Over at our sister-site Hot Air, Jazz Shaw is also critiquing Holder’s disgraceful exit, and notes that Holder didn’t even seem to understand his job.
Jazz seems to be under the illusion that Holder’s job was to enforce laws, not to be Obama’s enforcer.

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Scientists Say New Study Is A ‘Death Blow’ To Global Warming Hysteria

http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/31/scientists-say-new-study-is-a-death-blow-to-global-warming-hysteria/

new study out of Germany casts further doubt on the so-called global warming “consensus” by suggesting the atmosphere may be less sensitive to increases in carbon dioxide emissions than most scientists think.
A study by scientists at Germany’s Max Planck Institute for Meteorology found that man-made aerosols had a much smaller cooling effect on the atmosphere during the 20th Century than was previously thought. Why is this big news? It means increases in carbon dioxide emissions likely cause less warming than most climate models suggest.
What do aerosols have to do with anything? Well, aerosols are created from human activities like burning coal, driving cars or from fires. There are also natural aerosols like clouds and fog. Aerosols tend to reflect solar energy back into space, giving them a cooling effect that somewhat offsets warming from increased CO2 emissions.
The Max Planck study suggests “that aerosol radiative forcing is less negative and more certain than is commonly believed.” In layman’s terms, aerosols are offsetting less global warming than was previously thought. And if aerosols aren’t causing as much cooling, it must mean carbon dioxide must be causing less warming than climate models predict.
“Going forward we should expect less warming from future greenhouse gas emissions than climate models are projecting,” write climate scientists Pat Michaels and Chip Knappenberger with the libertarian Cato Institute, adding that this study could be a “death blow” to global warming hysteria.
Independent climate researcher Nick Lewis put out astudy last year with Georgia Tech’s Dr. Judith Curry that found that the climate’s response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 levels — a measurement called “climate sensitivity” was 1.64 degrees Celsius.
Lewis revised his findings based on the Max Planck aerosol study and found something astounding: climate sensitivity drops dramatically. Lewis also looked at climate sensitivity estimates given by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — often regarded as the world’s top authority on global warming.
The IPCC’s latest assessment put climate sensitivity between 1.5 and 4.5 degrees Celsius. The IPCC says that despite “the large uncertainty range, there is a high confidence that aerosols have offset a substantial portion of [greenhouse gas] global mean forcing.”
Basically, the IPCC says aerosols deflect a lot of warming — the opposite of the Max Planck study’s finding.
But incorporating the results from the Max Planck study dramatically reduces the upper bound estimate of climate sensitivity from 4.5 degrees to 1.8 degrees Celsius.
To put this into perspective, atmospheric concentrations of CO2 currently stand at around 400 parts per million, if this were to double, according to the IPCC’s estimates temperatures could rise as high as 4.5 degrees Celsius.
But incorporate the Max Planck study results and warming would only be as high as 1.8 degrees Celsius — less than half what the IPCC originally predicted.
Michaels and Knappenberger say Lewis’s findings basically eliminate “the possibility of catastrophic climate change—that is, climate change that proceeds at a rate that exceeds our ability to keep up.”
“Such a result will also necessarily drive down estimates of social cost of carbon thereby undermining a key argument use by federal agencies to support increasingly burdensome regulations which seek to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” write Michaels and Knappenberger.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contactlicensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.