Light the fire! The Generals are waiting!

http://americanpreppernation.net/?p=269

Promoted to major general, Mattis led the 1st Marine Division during the early stages of the Iraq War, overseeing the longest sustained overland advance in Marine Corps history. The division returned to the United States in late 2003 but redeployed to Iraq the following year, and Mattis led the marine assault on Al-Fallūjah. In May 2004 Mattis received his third star, and he was assigned to the Marine Corps Combat Development Command in Quantico, Virginia. There he sought to disseminate the lessons learned in Iraq and Afghanistan to troops in the field, and he worked with U.S. Army Gen. David Petraeus on Field Manual 3-24, a comprehensive counterinsurgency document.

Although known for blunt, sometimes provocative speech (in 2005 he described members of the Taliban as “fun to shoot”), Mattis was described by his peers as a “warrior monk” who embraced the Clausewitzian view of war as a political instrument. He established the Center for Advanced Operational Culture Learning, a training academy for marine officers and senior enlisted personnel, to instill cultural awareness and language skills, and he emphasized the “hearts and minds” approach to counterinsurgency operations. In 2007 Mattis was promoted to general and was chosen to lead Joint Forces Command, a training and planning unit that oversees the integration of the various branches of military service into a cohesive fighting force. After Gen. Stanley McChrystal was relieved as head of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan in 2010, a command shuffle ensued with Petraeus assuming McChrystal’s role and Mattis replacing Petraeus as head of Centcom.

He established the Center for Advanced Operational Culture Learning, a training academy for marine officers and senior enlisted personnel, to instill cultural awareness and language skills, and he emphasized the “hearts and minds” approach to counterinsurgency operations.::

PHONE NUMBER TO HIS ORGANIZATION

703-432-1504

Address

2300 Louisa St Quantico, Virginia 22134

Phone (571) 931-6716

Please call and ask he lead us!

Website http://www.tecom.usmc.mil/caocl

FACEBOOK PAGE https://www.facebook.com/CAOCL/info?tab=page_info

OUR FACEBOOK PAGE FOR THE GENERALhttps://www.facebook.com/groups/mattis4CIC/

FRIENDS: I CONTINUE TO PROPOSE GENERAL JAMES MAD DOG MATTIS AS AN “INTERIM” COMMANDER IN CHIEF… I DO NOT THINK WE WILL GET ANYWHERE WITH A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT SO LONG AS THE SYSTEM IS NOT TWEAKED AND IT CANNOT BE UNTIL WE PURGE THE FEDERAL JUDGES AND THE BUREAUCRACY. WHY COMMANDER IN CHIEF AND NOT PRESIDENT YOU MIGHT ASK?? READ THE POST! REVOLUTION…. ITS THE ONLY WAY WE TAKE IT BACK!!

John Gaultier

http://john-gaultier.blogspot.com/

MUSLIM WAR ON ISRAEL: Obama Says He Will No Longer Protect Jewish State

http://patdollard.com/2015/03/war-on-israel-obama-says-he-will-no-longer-protect-jewish-state/-
OBAMA TRUELY IS THE ENEMY WITHIN !! HE HAS TURNED HIS BACK ON BELOVED ISRAEL AND INSTEAD IS ARMING IRAN WITH NUCLEAR MISSILES TO DESTROY US
Obama rewards U.S. enemy Iran with nukes while punishing U.S. ally Israel every way he can. What does that tell you?

Excerpted from Politico: In the wake of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive reelection, the Obama administration is revisiting longtime assumptions about America’s role as a shield for Israel against international pressure.

Angered by Netanyahu’s hard-line platform toward the Palestinians, top Obama officials would not rule out the possibility of a change in American posture at the United Nations, where the U.S. has historically fended off resolutions hostile to Israel.

And despite signals from Israel suggesting that Netanyahu might walk back his rejection, late in the campaign, of a Palestinian state under his watch, Obama officials say they are taking him at his word.

“The positions taken by the prime minister in the last days of the campaign have raised very significant substantive questions that go far beyond just optics,” said a senior administration official, adding that recent Israeli government actions were in keeping with Netanyahu’s rhetoric.

While saying it was “premature” to discuss Washington’s policy response, the official wouldn’t rule out a modified American posture at the United Nations, where the U.S. has long fended off resolutions criticizing Israeli settlement activity and demanding its withdrawal from Palestinian territories.

“We are signaling that if the Israeli government’s position is no longer to pursue a Palestinian state, we’re going to have to broaden the spectrum of options we pursue going forward,” the official said.

There is no virtually no chance that the U.S. will trim its financial or military support for Israel. But some analysts believe that going forward, Netanyahu may be vulnerable in international forums where the U.S. has long been a bulwark against criticism of Israel and its presence in Palestinian territories.

“I do think the administration is going to look very closely at the possibility of either joining, or at least not blocking an internationally backed move at the U.N. to restate the parameters for ending the conflict,” said Jeremy Ben-Ami, president of the left-leaning pro-Israel group J Street.

The U.S. has run critical interference for Israel on such measures in the past. Last November, the U.N. Security Council considered a draft resolution, pushed by the Palestinians and Arab countries, demanding an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank within three years. The U.S. quietly quashed the effort.

In February 2011, Obama exercised his first Security Council veto to strike down a resolution condemning Israeli settlement activity in Palestinian territory. Every other one of the Security Council’s 15 members supported the resolution.